Pengelolaan Agenda Perubahan Iklim dalam Skenario Sistem Dunia Kappen: Respons Kebijakan Indonesia

Hariyadi Hariyadi

Abstract

Isu perubahan iklim telah menjadi isu penting dalam konstelasi politik nasional dan global. Secara kekinian, upaya untuk mengelola isu tersebut dapat dilihat dengan sebuah skenario sistem dunia yang akan terjadi sehingga setiap negara dapat meresponsnya secara tepat. Dengan menggunakan skenario sistem dunia yang digagas van Kappen pengelolaan isu perubahan iklim secara nasional dan global masih menghadapi tantangan berat. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa setiap negara harus mengambil kebijakan satisfycing. Dalam konteks ini, Indonesia harus lebih mendasarkan kebijakannya dalam skenario sistem dunia terfragmentasi van Kappen. Dalam konstelasi skenario sistem ini, kebijakan Indonesia harus mendorong upaya pengelolaan perubahan iklim berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip common but differentiated responsibilities, keadilan iklim, dan hak membangun. Untuk mewujudkan kebijakan ini, melalui diplomasi konstruktif Indonesia perlu berupaya mewujudkan komitmen penurunan emisinya secara nasional dalam rangka mendorong komitmen negara-negara maju.

Keywords

perubahan iklim; sistem dunia; global governance; respons kebijakan;

References

Buku

Akaha, Tsuneo and Frank and Langdon, (ed.). Japan in the Posthegemonic World. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publisher,1993.

Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. “Nonstate Global Governance: Is Forest Certification a Legitimate Alternative to a Global Forest Convention?” in Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards In Global Trade, Environment And Social Governance, 2003.

Brundtland, Gro Harlem. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. New York: WCED, 1987.

Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J. C. Minx, eds.. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and NY, USA, 2014.

Gabriel, Jurg Maartin. Worldviews and Theories of International Relations. New York: ST. Martin’s Press, Inc., 1994.

Howlett, Michael and M. Ramesh. Studying Pubic Policy: Policy Cycle and Policy Subsystems, NY: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.

Jackson, Robert & Sorensen, George. Pengantar Studi Hubungan Internasional, terj. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.

Kumar, Ashwani and Dirk Messner, eds. Power Shifts and Global Governance, Challenges from South and North, London: Routledge, 2011.

Light, Donald; Keller, Suzanne and Calhoun, Craig. Sociology. Fifth ed. New York: Alfred A . Knopf, Inc., 1989.

Morgenthau, Hans J. Politik Antar-Bangsa (terj.). Direvisi Kenneth W Thompson. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2010.

Little, Richard. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models. UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007.

Ross, Katherine., Damassa, Thomas. Assessing the Post-2020 Clean Energy Landscape. Technical Note. USA: World Resource Institue, 2015.

Rourke, John T. International Politics on the World Stage. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 1986.

Stiglitz, Joseph E. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: Norton, 2002.

United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). The Emissions Gap Report 2016. Executive summary. Paris: UNEP, 2017.

Weiss, Thomas G. and Ramesh Thakur. Global Governance and the UN, an Unfinished Journey, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana Univ. Press, 2010.

Weiss, Thomas G. “Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges”, dalam Ashwani Kumar dan Dirk Messner (ed.), Power Shifts and Global Governance, Challenges from South and North, UK & USA, Anthem Press, 2011.

Jurnal

Forrester, John. “Bounded Rationality and the Politics of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review 44 (1984): 23-30.

Galtung, Johan. “A Structural Theory of Imperalism. Journal of Peace Research” Vol.8, No. 2, (1971): 81-117.

Sivaram, Varun and Teryn Norris. “The Clean Energy Revolution: Fighting Climate Change With Innovation,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 95, Issue 3, (June 2016): 147-156.

Makalah dan Kertas Kerja

Damassa, T., Fransen, T., Haya, B., Ge, M., Pjeczka, K., Ross, D. A. N. K., & Eksekutif, R. “Menginterpretasikan Indc : Menilai Transparansi Target Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca Pasca-2020.” Kertas Kerja., 2016: 1-12.

Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change/IPCC. “Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment report of the IPCC.” Summary for Policy Makers and Technical Summary, 2007.

Kappen, Frank van.New security threats; The UN, NATO and Challenges in global governance. Clingendael Lecture (Indonesia), tt.

Internet

Repetto, Robert. “America’s Climate Problem, the Way Forward”, Earthscan, diakses kembali 19 Juni 2017, http://www.earthscan.co.uk/tabid/102581/Default.aspx#dnn_ctr287409_ViewProductInfo_fragment3;.

Republika Online. “JK Tegaskan Komitmen Indonesia Dukung Kesepakatan Paris”, diakses 21 November 2017, http://nasional.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/umum/17/06/15/orkxly-jk-tegaskankomitmen-indonesia-dukung-kesepakatanparis.

Samadhi, Nirarta. “Meninjau Ulang Komitmen Emisi Indonesia”, WRI, diakses 1 Mei 2017 ,http://www.wri-indonesia.org/id/blog/meninjau-ulang-komitmen-emisiindonesia.

Tumiwa, Fabby. “Implikasi Keluarnya Amerika Serikat dari Paris Agreement terhadap Agenda Perubahan Iklim Global”, diakses 22 November 2017, http://iesr.or.id/2017/06/implikasi-keluarnyaamerika-serikat-dari-paris-agreementterhadap-agenda-perubahan-iklim-globalbagian-2/?lang=en.

Tjandra, Grace. “The Paris Agreement: Can Indonesia Be The Next Brazil?”, diakses 22 November 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/09/the-paris-agreement-canindonesia-be-the-next-brazil/

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.