AKUNTABILITAS DAN KONDISI KEUANGAN DAERAH OTONOMI KHUSUS PADA PROVINSI ACEH, PAPUA, DAN PAPUA BARAT

Fajri Ramadhan; Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik

doi:10.22212/jekp.v14i1.2382

AKUNTABILITAS DAN KONDISI KEUANGAN DAERAH OTONOMI KHUSUS PADA PROVINSI ACEH, PAPUA, DAN PAPUA BARAT

Fajri Ramadhan, Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik

10.22212/jekp.v14i1.2382

| Abstract views: 0 |

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between the financial condition of the three special autonomous regions, Aceh, Papua, and West Papua with regional financial accountability as proxied by the opinion variable on regional financial statements audited by BPK RI. Using Conditional Logistic Fixed Effect method, the study uses financial ratios based on regional financial data from 2011-2019. The result of the study is that there is a relationship between accountability and financial condition of the special autonomy regional government. Variable of Special Allocation Fund (DAK) divided by total transfer is consistent to enhance accountability. The ratio of Revenue Sharing (DBH) per total income, operating and capital expenditures per total expenditure are consistent and significant in reducing the possibility of an Unqualified Opinion (WTP). All of these findings are in line with the development of calculations that use an ordered logit marginal effect to see the percentage of possible occurrences of opinions and their relationship to various ratios that become research variables. Various findings based on data processing and marginal effect calculations indicate that there is a need to revise DBH policies and regional expenditures, and the application of DAK in regions that have not yet received a WTP opinion.

Keywords: asymmetric decentralization, local financial condition, accountability

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji hubungan kondisi keuangan tiga daerah otonomi khusus (otsus), yaitu Aceh, Papua, dan Papua Barat dengan akuntabilitas keuangan daerah yang diproksikan oleh variabel opini laporan keuangan daerah hasil pemeriksaan BPK RI. Menggunakan metode Conditional Logistic Fixed Effect, penelitian ini menggunakan rasio keuangan berdasarkan data keuangan daerah tahun 2011-2019. Hasil penelitian adalah adanya hubungan antara akuntabilitas dengan kondisi keuangan pemerintah daerah otsus. Variabel yang konsisten mendorong terciptanya akuntabilitas adalah variabel rasio Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK) dibagi total dana transfer. Rasio Dana Bagi Hasil (DBH) per total pendapatan serta belanja operasi dan belanja modal per total belanja konsisten dan signifikan dalam mengurangi kemungkinan terwujudnya opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian (WTP). Seluruh temuan ini sejalan dengan pengembangan perhitungan yang juga menggunakan marginal effect ordered logit untuk melihat persentase kemungkinan keterjadian opini dan hubungannya dengan berbagai rasio yang menjadi variabel penelitian. Berbagai temuan berdasarkan olah data dan perhitungan marginal effect menunjukkan bahwa perlu adanya pembenahan kebijakan DBH dan belanja daerah, serta penerapan DAK pada daerah yang belum memperoleh opini WTP.

Kata kunci: desentralisasi asimetris, kondisi keuangan daerah, akuntabilitas

Keywords

asymmetric decentralization; local financial condition; accountability; desentralisasi asimetris; kondisi keuangan daerah; akuntabilitas

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku:

Aziz, N.L.L. & Zuhro, R.S. (2018). Dinamika pengawasan dana otonomi khusus dan istimewa. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2020a). Ikhtisar hasil pemeriksaan semester I 2020. Hasil Pemeriksaan Pemerintah Daerah. Jakarta: BPK RI.

Subires, M.D.L. & Bolivar, M.P.R. (2017). Financial sustainability in governments. A new concept and measure for meeting new information needs. Financial Sustainability in Public Administration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Jurnal dan Working Paper:

Agustina, N. & Setyaningrum, D. (2020). Determinants quality of local government financial statements in Indonesia. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9, 226-239.

Allain-Dupré, D., Chatry, I., & Moisio, A. (2020), Asymmetric decentralisation: Trends, challenges and policy Implications. OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 10, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/0898887a-en

Aparicio-Pérez, D., Balaguer-Coll, M.T., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2021). Politics against economics: The case of Spanish regional financing. Working Papers 2021/15, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellon (Spain).

Baetschmann, G., Ballantyne, A., Staub, K.E., & Winkelmann, R. (2020). Feologit: A new command for fitting fixedeffects ordered logit models. The Stata Journal, 20(2), 253-275.

Basta, K. & Henderson, A. (2021). Multinationalism, constitutional asymmetry and COVID: UK responses to the pandemic. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 27(3), 293-310.

Battey, H.S., Cox, D.R., & Jackson, M.V. (2019). On the linear in probability model for binary data. Royal Society open science, 6(5), 190067.

Brueckner, M., Pappa, E., & Valentinyi, A. (2022). Geographic cross‐sectional fiscal spending multipliers and the role of local autonomy: Evidence from European Regions. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 0, 1-40.

Budiratna, H. & Qibthiyyah, R.M. (2020). Evaluasi atas transfer dana otonomi khusus di Aceh, Papua, dan Papua Barat. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 1(5), 402-414.

Canare, T. (2021). Decentralization and development outcomes: What does the empirical literature really say?. Hacienda Publica Espanola, 237, 111-151.

Cahyaningsih, A. & Fitrady, A. (2019). The impact of asymmetric fiscal decentralization on education and health outcomes: evidence from Papua Province, Indonesia. Economics & Sociology, 12(2), 48-63.

Casinillo, L.F., Casinillo, E.L., & Casinillo, M.F. (2020). On happiness in teaching: An ordered logit modeling approach.

JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 290-300.

Efriandi, T., Couwenberg, O., & Holzhacker, R.L. (2019). Decentralization and public service provision. Contemporary

Southeast Asia, 41(3), 364-389.

Hajilou, M., Mirehei, M., Amirian, S., & Pilehvar, M. (2018). Financial sustainability of municipalities and local governments in small-sized cities; A case of Shabestar Municipality. Lex Localis, 16(1), 77-106.

Khairudin, K. (2013). Does financial performance of local government influence on the audit agency opinion? Jurnal

Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(1), 33-54.

Lele, G. (2019). Asymmetric decentralization and the problem of governance: The case of Indonesia. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(4), 544-565.

Long, J.S. & Mustillo, S.A. (2021). Using predictions and marginal effects to compare groups in regression models for binary outcomes. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(3), 1284-1320.

Madubun, J. & Akib, H. (2017). The prototype model of asymmetric decentralization in providing public services to the island areas. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 209-209.

Martínez‐Vázquez, J., Lago‐Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2016). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 00(0), 1-35.

McDonald III, B.D. (2017). Measuring the fiscal health of municipalities. Working Paper No. WP17BM1, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press.

McDonald III, B.D. (2019). The challenges and implications of fiscal health. South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business, 15(2), 78-99.

Muluk, M.R.K. (2021). Systematic literature review on asymmetric decentralization. Bisnis & Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 28(2), 96-105.

Pambudi, A.S., Hidayati, S., Putri, D.A.C., & Wibowo, A.D.C. (2021). Special allocation fund (DAK) for education sector: A development evaluation perspective of fiscal year 2019. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 29(1), 41-58.

Prabowo, P.A., Supriyono, B., Noor, I., & Muluk, M.K. (2020). Special autonomy policy evaluation to improve community welfare in Papua Province Indonesia. International Journal of Excellence in Government, 2(1), 24-40.

Qiao, M., Ding, S., & Liu, Y. (2019). Fiscal decentralization and government size: The role of democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 59, 316-330.

Rahmasari, A. & Setiawan, D. (2021). The determinants of frauds in local governments. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 13(1), 37-50.

Ritonga, I.T. (2014). Developing a measure of local governments financial condition. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business. 29(2), 142-164.

Taamneh, M., Rawabdeh, M.A., & Abu‐Hummour, A.M. (2020). Evaluation of decentralization experience through political, administrative, and fiscal indicators: The case of Jordan. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2), e2026.

Tan, E. & Avshalom-Uster, A. (2021). How does asymmetric decentralization affect local fiscal performance?. Regional Studies, 55(6), 1071-1083.

Sumber Digital:

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2020b). Ragam opini BPK. Diperoleh tanggal 3 Juni 2021, dari https://www.bpk.go.id/news/ragam-opini-bpk.

Williams, R. (2018). Panel data 3: conditional logit/fixed effects logit models. Diperoleh tanggal 4 Juni 2021, dari

https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats3/Panel03-FixedEffects.pdf.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan:

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2001 jo Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2008 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua Menjadi Undang-Undang.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22212/jekp.v14i1.2382