Pengukuran Kesinambungan Fiskal di Indonesia
Abstract
Fiscal sustainability has become a concern in many economies due to increasing government debt trends, including in Indonesia. The results of existing research on fiscal sustainability show no uniformity in measurement indicators and provisions for the government debt threshold. This study aims to measure the fiscal sustainability threshold in Indonesia. This research was conducted using time series data during the 2000 – 2019 period and applied four measurement methods: the standard method, the Operational Recursive Algorithm, the probabilistic method, and the sudden stop of modal flow in Indonesia.The measurement results show that fiscal policy in Indonesia is not sustainable based on the standard method of fiscal policy during the period 2000 - 2019. However, the Operational Recursive Algorithm method results show that fiscal policy in Indonesia is sustainable. The Probabilistic approach estimates that the safe ratio of government debt is 69.69%, concluding that Indonesia's fiscal sector is sustainable. The Sudden Stop approach shows that in 2005 – 2014, 2016, and 2019, the value of β is larger than 1. This value means that the position of government debt is dominated by debt in domestic currency units, tradable goods dominate national income, and fiscal sustainability is influenced more by changes in the internal environment. In 2015 and 2017 – 2019, however, the value of β is lower than 1. This shift is due to an increase in debt denominated in domestic currency followed by a decrease in the composition of tradable goods. The overall conclusion from the analysis using the four methods is that fiscal policy in Indonesia is a sustainable policy.
Abstrak
Kesinambungan fiskal menjadi perhatian di banyak perekonomian, terutama dengan adanya tren peningkatan jumlah utang pemerintah di banyak negara, termasuk di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian yang ada tentang kesinambungan fiskal menunjukkan ketidakseragaman dalam hal indikator pengukuran maupun ketentuan ambang batas utang pemerintah. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengukur ambang batas kesinambungan fiskal di Indonesia, dengan mengaplikasikan empat metode pengukuran, yaitu: metode standar, operational recursive algorithm, probabilistic dan sudden stop aliran modal. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder berbentuk kurun waktu selama periode tahun 2000 sampai dengan 2019. Hasil pengukuran menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan metode standar kebijakan fiskal selama periode tahun 2000 - 2019 tidak berkesinambungan. Namun hasil metode Operasional Recursive Algorithm menunjukkan kebijakan fiskal di Indonesia merupakan kebijakan yang berkesinambungan. Estimasi pendekatan Probabilistic menunjukkan bahwa rasio utang pemerintah yang aman adalah 69,69% sehingga fiskal di Indonesia berkesinambungan. Pendekatan Sudden Stop menunjukkan bahwa pada 2005 – 2014, 2016, dan 2019 besarnya lebih besar dari 1. Hal ini menunjukkan posisi utang pemerintah didominasi oleh utang dalam satuan mata uang domestik, pendapatan nasional didominasi oleh tradable goods, dan kesinambungan fiskal lebih dipengaruhi perubahan lingkungan internal. Pada tahun 2015, 2017 – 2019 nilai lebih kecil dari 1. Kesimpulan akhir dari analisis dengan keempat metode tersebut adalah bahwa kebijakan fiskal di Indonesia adalah kebijakan yang berkesinambungan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Buku
Marris, S. (1987). Tradable and Nontradable Goods. Book, (Special Edition of Macroeconomics).
Marselina, (2014). Implikasi Penerapan Kaidah Kebijakan Fiskal (Fiscal Rule) terhadap Variabel-Variabel Ekonomi Makro di Indonesia Pendekatan Makroekonomika Konsensus Baru (New Consensus Macroeconomics)., (Disertasi, tidak dipublikasikan) Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Jurnal
Adams, C., Ferrarini, B., & Park, D. (2010). Fiscal sustainability in Developing Asia.
Afonso, A., & Jalles, J. T. (2016). The elusive character of fiscal sustainability. Applied Economics, 48(28), 2651–2664. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846. 2015.1128074
Akram, N. (2015),"Is public debt hindering economic growth of the Philippines?", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 42 Iss 3 pp. 202 - 221 http://dx. doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2013-0047
Ahlborn, M & Schweickert, R. (2017). Public debt and economic growth, economic system matter. Int Econ, Econ Policy. http://doi.0rg/10.1007/s10368-017-03960.
Ajovin, M.P. & Navarro, M.S. (2015). Grangger causality between debt and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. International Review of Economics and Finance 35: 66-77.
Ascarya, & Yumanita, D. (2004). Utang pemerintah dan kesinambungan fiskal. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, III(1), 1–26.
Auerbach, A. J., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Sustainability, F. (2017). Fiscal stimulus and fiscal sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/ papers/ w23789.
Baharumshah, A. Z., Soon, S. V., & Lau, E. (2017). Fiscal sustainability in an emerging market economy: When does public debt turn bad? Journal of Policy Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2016.11.002.
Borio, C., Lombardi, M., & Zampolli, F. (2017). Fiscal sustainability and the financial cycle. In rethinking fiscal policy after the crisis. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/ 9781316675861.013.
Calvo, G. A., Izquierdo, A., & Talvi, E. (2004). Sudden stops, the real exchange rate, and fiscal sustainability: Argentina’s lessons. In monetary unions and hard pegs: Effects on trade, financial development, and stability. https://doi.org/10.1093/ 0199271402.003.0010.
Cecchetti, S. G., Mohanty, M., & Zampolli, F. (2011). The real effects of debt. Economic Symposium Conference Proceedings, 352(352), 145–196. https://doi.org/10.1093 /rfs/hhm061.
Baum. A., Checherita. C. C., Rother. P.,(2012) Debt and Growth New Evidence for The Euro Area. Working Paper Series No 1450. The European Central Bank (ECB).
Rodriguez, A. C., (2014). Assessing fiscal sustainability in some selected countries. Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor Din Romania -, 06(595), 7–22.
Eberhardt, M., & Presbitero, A. F. (2015). Public debt and growth: heterogeneity and non-linearity. Journal of International Economics, 97(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.04.005.
Égert, B. (2015). Public debt, economic growth and non-linear effects: myth or reality? Journal of Macroeconomics, 43, 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmacro. 2014.11.006.
Everaert, G., & Jansen, S. (2018). On the estimation of panel fiscal reaction functions: heterogeneity or fiscal fatigue? Economic Modelling, 70(September), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.10.014.
Futagami, K. Morita, Y. Shibata, A (1993). Dynamic analysis of an andogenous growth model with public. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95(4), 607–625.
Pamungkas, R.H. (2016). Estimation of Indonesia’s fiscal reaction function estimasi fungsi reaksi fiskal Indonesia. Kajian Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 20(1). Retrieved from http://fiskal.depkeu.go.id/ejournal.
Insukindro. (2018). The Effect of twin shock on fiscal sustainability in Indonesia. Journal of Economic & Sociology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10. 14254/2071.
Kempa, B., & Khan, N. S. (2017). Spillover effects of debt and growth in the Euro area: evidence from a GVAR model. International Review of Economics and Finance, 49(January), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.01.024.
Kourtellos, A., Stengos, T., & Tan, C. M. (2013). The effect of public debt on growth in multiple regimes. Journal of Macroeconomics, 38(PA), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.08.023.
Lof, M., & Malinen, T. (2014). Does sovereign debt weaken economic growth? a panel VAR analysis. Economics Letters, 122(3), 403–407. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.037
Maria, Y., & Mudayen, V. (2017). The impact of government’s foreign debt on fiscal sustainability of Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 746–751. Retrieved from http:www.econjournals.com.
Neaime, S., & Gaysset, I. (2017). Sustainability of macroeconomic policies in selected countries: post financial and debt crises. Research in International Business and Finance, 40, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ribaf.2017.01.001.
Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100, 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.573.
Raymundo. B. R., (2016). Fiscal sustainability and sovereignty issues under an ASEAN Economic Union: In DLSU Research Congress 2016 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Santoso, B. (2006), Studi kesinambungan fiskal di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi Vol No. 3, April 2006 (235-258).
Shastri, S., Giri, A. K., & Mohapatra, G. (2017). An empirical sssessment of fiscal sustainability for selected South Asian Economies. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XXIV(1), 163–178.
Simarmata, D. A. (2007). Fiscal sustainability in Indonesia. Indonesian Economic Journal.
Sriyana, J., & Hakim, A. (2017). Balance sheet approach for fiscal sustainability in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 68–72. Retrieved from http:www.econjournals.com.
Teles, V. K., & Mussolini, C. (2014). Public debt and the limits of fiscal policy to increase economic growth. European Economic Review, 66, 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.003.
Tran, N. (2018). Debt threshold for fiscal sustainability sassessment in emerging economies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.01.011.
Woo J and Kumar (2015) Public debt and growth. Economica Vol 82. Issue 328 7-5-739.
Sumber Digital
Badan Kebijakan Fiskal Kementrian Keuangan. (2019). Analisis keberlanjutan fiskal jangka panjang. Diperoleh tanggal 27 April 2007 dari https://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/ data/document/ 2020/ltfs/LTFS-Updated.pdf
Bank Indonesia. (2022a). Statistik Utang Sektor Publik (SUSPI) 2014, 2016, 2017, 2019. 2022. Diperoleh pada 12 Desember 2022 dari https://www.bi.go.id/id/statistik/ekonomi-keuangan/suspi/default.aspx
Bank Indonesia. (2022b). Statistik Ekonomi dan Keuangan (SEKI) 2014, 2016, 2017, 2019. 2022. Diperoleh pada 12 Desember 2022 dari https://www.bi.go.id/id/statistik/ekonomi-keuangan/suspi/default.aspx
Blanchard et al. (1990). The sustainability of fiscal policy : an old answer to an old question. OECD Economic Studies. Diperoleh pada 1 April 2020 dari https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/5183200
Cuddington, J. T. (1996). Analysing the sustainability of fiscal deficits in Developing Countries. Diperoleh pada 12 Januari 2020 dari cuddingj@gunet.georgetown.edu.
Departemen Keuangan, RI. (2017), Profil Utang Pemerintah Pusat. Direktorat Jendral Pengelolaan Pembiayaan dan Resiko Edisi April 2017. Diperoleh pada 12 Januari 2020 dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/
DPR RI (2022). Tugas dan wewenang DPR RI. Diperoleh dari
https://www.dpr.go.id/ tentang/tugas-wewenang diakses 17 Desember 2022.
Friesenbichler, K., & Glocker, C. (2017). Tradability and productivity growth differentials across EU Member States. MPRA, (83382). Diperoleh pada 17 Januari 2020 dari https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83382/
IMF, (2020a). Assessing Sustainability. Diperoleh pada 5 Februari 2021 dari https://www.imf.org
IMF, (2020b). International Financial Statistic. Diperoleh pada 5 Februari 2021 dari https://www.imf.org
IMF, (2022). World Economic Outlook Database diperoleh pada 15 Desember 2022 dari https://www.imf.org
Izquierdo, A., Alvarado, C. D., & Panizza, U. (2004). Fiscal sustainability in emerging market countries with an application to Ecuador. SSRN. Diperoleh pada 2 Februari 2020 dari https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1818713
Croce. E., and Ramon. V. H. J. (2003). Assessing fiscal sustainability: a cross-country comparison (WP/03/145). Diperoleh pada 2 Januari 2020 dari https://www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp03145.pdf
Kemenkeu. (2020). Press conference langkah penguatan perlindungan sosial dan stimulus ekonomi menghadapi dampak COVID-19. Diperoleh pada 21 Mei 2020 dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/
Kemenkeu. (2019) Nota Keuangan dan RAPBN 2016. Diperoleh pada 2 Februari 2020 dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/
Kemenkeu. (2022). Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat (LKPP), berbagai edisi. Diperoleh terakhir 12 Desember 2022 dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/
Kemenkeu. (2022). Advertorial, RAPBN 2023 Peningkatan Produktivitas untuk Transformasi Ekonomi yang Inklusif dan Berkelanjutan. Diperoleh 15 Desember 2022 dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/
Krejdl, A. (2006). Fiscalsustainability-definition, indicators and
assessment of Czech -ublicfinance sustainability. Diperoleh pada 5 Januari 2020 dari http://www.cnb.cz.
Lestari, T. (2014). Can Indonesia’s fiscal policy be sustained, with exploding debt? Working Paper in Economics and Development Studies, No. 201415, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, viewed 28 July 2015 at http://lp3e.fe. unpad.ac.id/wopeds/201415.pdf.
Mendoza, E. G., & Oviedo, P. M. (2004). Fiscal solvency and macroeconomic uncertainty in emerging markets : The tale of the tormented insurer, (June). Diperoleh pada 5 Januari 2020 dari https://www.imf.org/external/np/res/seminars/2004/60/pdf/ mendoz.pdf.
OECD (2020) https://www.oecd.org diakses tanggal 10 Januari 2020.
Reinhart, C. M., Rogoff, K. S., & Savastano, M. A. (2003). Debt intolerence. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2003(1), 1–62. Diperoleh pada 3 Maret 2020 dari http://www.nber.org/ papers/w9908
World Bank (2019). International Debt Statistc. Diperoleh pada 10 Mei 2020 dari https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.DOD.TOTL.GD.ZS
Zeugner, S. (2013). Tradable vs Non-tradable: an empirical approach to the Classification of sectors. Diperoleh pada 5 Mei 2020 dari http://oe.cd/tiva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.