THE ROLE OF THE SPECIAL AUTONOMY FUND TO IMPROVE THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN THE PAPUA PROVINCE

Ari Mulianta Ginting
| Abstract views: 0 | views: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the special autonomy fund's role in public service in health and education sector in districts/cities in Papua Province. Using panel data from 29 districts/cities in Papua Province covering 2013-2020, our findings are based on panel data. The special autonomy fund has a positive and significant impact on public service in health and education sector in districts/cities in Papua Provinces. Moreover, we identify that fiscal decentralization also positively and significantly affects public service in districts/ cities in Papua Province. A special autonomy fund is a necessary condition for increasing public service. There are requirements to implement the special funding for Papua, such as participation of the people in determining and supervising the use of the special fund, accountability of local government to use the special fund, synergy, and coordination among stakeholders in Papua. Finally, the central government must ensure that special funds must be allocated to public services such as health and education sector. Indonesian Parliament should make an evaluation and monitoring of the special autonomy fund for Papua Province. The evaluation and monitoring of the special autonomy fund are needed in order to fulfill the aims of the fund.

Keywords: fiscal policy, public economics, regional autonomy, special autonomy fund, public service

Abstrak

Tulisan ini mengkaji peran dana otonomi khusus (otsus) terhadap pelayanan publik baik di bidang kesehatan maupun pendidikan di kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Papua. Menggunakan data panel dari 29 kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Papua tahun 2013-2020, temuan kami didasarkan pada data panel. Dana otsus berdampak positif dan signifikan terhadap pelayanan publik baik di bidang kesehatan maupun pendidikan di kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Papua. Selain itu, kami mengidentifikasi desentralisasi fiskal juga berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap pelayanan publik di kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Papua. Dana otsus merupakan prasyarat untuk peningkatan pelayanan publik. Ada persyaratan untuk melaksanakan dana khusus untuk Papua, seperti partisipasi masyarakat dalam menentukan dan mengawasi penggunaan dana khusus, akuntabilitas pemerintah daerah untuk menggunakan dana khusus, sinergi, dan koordinasi para pemangku kepentingan di Papua. Terakhir, pemerintah pusat harus memastikan dana khusus harus dialokasikan untuk pelayanan publik seperti sektor kesehatan dan pendidikan. DPR RI perlu mendorong pengawasan dan evaluasi terhadap dana otonomi khusus di Provinsi Papua agar sesuai dengan tujuan pemberian dana tersebut.

Kata kunci: kebijakan fiskal, ekonomi regional, ekonomi publik, ekonomi regional, Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua

Keywords

fiscal policy; public economics; regional autonomy; special autonomy fund; public service; kebijakan fiskal; ekonomi regional; ekonomi publik; ekonomi regional; Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books:

Baltagi, B.H. (2008). Econometrics (4th ed.). New York: Springer.

BPS. (2014). Indeks pembangunan manusia 2013. Jakarta:BPS. CBO9781107415324.004

Gujarati, D.N. (2004). Basic econometric. New York: McGraw Hill.

Hardiansyah. (2011). Kualitas pelayanan publik. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Riris, K. (2018). Menakar capaian otonomi khusus Papua (First). Jakarta: Penerbit Obor.

Journals & Reports:

Adam, A. & Delis, M.D.P.K. (2012). Fiscal decentralization and public service sector efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries (No. 36889). Accessed 20 January 2023, retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/36889/1/MPRA_paper_36889.pdf.

Agus, P. (2020). Pengaruh pendapatan daerah terhadap belanja modal dan indeks pembangunan manusia provinsidi Indonesia tahun 2005-2018. Jurnal Widyaiswara Indonesia, 1(1), 20-36.

Agustinus, J. (2016). Pengelolaan keuangan yang efektif dan efisien dalam meningkatkan kekuatan ekonomi bagi masyarakat Papua dan Papua Barat di Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 14(4), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.18202/jam23026332.14.4.13

Arzaghi, M. & Henderson, J.V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1157–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.009

Diaz-Serrano, L. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2015). Decentralization and the welfare state: What do citizens perceive? Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0599-5

Ebel, R. & Yilmaz, S. (2016). On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralization (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2809). World Bank Policy Research Working No, 2809.

Elisabeth, A. (2016). Perdamaian dan pembangunan Papua: Problematika politik atau ekonomi? Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(1), 19–31.

Falleti, T.G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization : Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327–346.

Imam, R. & Hafis, A. (2019). Desentralisasi asimetris: Kemiskinan di tengah kelimpahan otonomi khusus Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik,5(2), 1180-1192.

Jhonny, A. & Maruyani, S. (2018). The effect of fund allocation of special autonomy of economic growth in West Papua Province. RJOAS, 5(77), 188–194.

Jia, J., Guo, Q., & Zhang, J. (2014). Fiscal decentralization and local expenditure policy in China. China Economic Review, 28, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.002

Lessmann, C. (2009). Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: Evidence from cross-section and panel data. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(10), 2455–2473. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41296

Malak, S. (2012). Otonomi Khusus Papua. Ar-raafi. Ar Raafi. Accessed 23 March 2023, retrieved from https://www.

researchgate.net/publication/301348375_Otonomi_Khusus_Papua

Marit, E.L., & Warami, H. (2018). Wacana “Papua Tanah Damai” Dalam Bingkai Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial FISIP Universitas Cenderawasih, 16(1), 41-46.

Mitchell, A. & Bossert, T.J. (2010). Decentralization, governance, and health-system performance: "Where you stand depends on where you sit." Development Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00504.x

Mustikawati, R. & Maulana, A. (2020). Provinsi papua sebelum dan sesudah 18 tahun pemberian dana otonomi khusus. Jurnal Public Policy, 6(2), 81-89.

Nurmasari & Al Hafis, R.I. (2019). Desentralisasi Asimetris: Kemiskinan ditengah kelimpahan otonomi khusus papua. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 1180–1192.

Permai, S.D., Jauri, R., & Chowanda, A. (2019). Spatial autoregressive (SAR) model for the average expenditure of

Papua Province. Procedia Computer Science, 157, 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.011

Prabowo, P.A., Supriyono, B., & Noor, I. (2019). Special autonomy policy evaluation to improve community welfare in Papua Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Excellence in Government, 1(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEG-06-2019-0011

Pratomo, R.R. (2021). Sosialisasi tentang dampak otonomi khusus dan potensi pemekaran wilayah Papua kepada masyarakat umum. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 28-35.

Rochendi, S., & Saleh, K. (2017). Hubungan pemerintah pusat dan daerah dalam otonomi khusus di Provinsi Papua Barat. Jurnal Politik Universitas Nasional.

Ruhyanto, A. (2016). The perils of prosperity approach in Papua. Peace Review, 28(4), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2016.1237126

Tiebout. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1360/zd-2013-43-6-1064

Suryani, F. & Pujiono, P. (2020). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Kesejlasan Sasaran Anggaran, Desentralisasi dan Akuntabilitas Publik terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting (COSTING), 4(1), 167-181.

Wehner, J. (2000). Asymmetrical devolution. Development Southern Africa, 17(2).

White, S. (2011). Government decentralization in the 21st century. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Yanuarti, S. (2002). Kemiskinan dan konflik Papua di tengah sumber daya yang melimpah. Jurnal Politik Lipi, 9(1), 33–46.

Digital Sources:

Kemitraan. (2008). Kebijakan otonomi khusus di Indonesia: Pembelajaran dari kasus Aceh, Papua, Jakarta, dan Yogyakarta. Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Accessed 21 Februari 2023,

retrieved from https://library.kemitraan.or.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=10802Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus

Di Indonesia.pdf.

Malak, S. (2012). Otonomi Khusus Papua. Ar-raafi. Ar Raafi. Accessed 23 March 2023, retrieved from https://www.

researchgate.net/publication/301348375_Otonomi_Khusus_Papua.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.