MENILAI KESIAPAN MIANGAS MERESPON DAMPAK AKTIVITASTERORIS PRO- ISIS DI FILIPINA SELATAN

Poltak Partogi Nainggolan
| Abstract views: 0 | views: 0

Abstract

An escalation of low intensity conflict and an awkward position of pro-ISIS terrorists groups because of President Duterte’s military operation could bring implications to Miangas. The island in the most northern part of Indonesia which has boundary with the Philippines in its waters has been anticipated by the country’s authorities as an evacuated route which can be used as a new military base for the Abu Sayyaf, Maute groups and other pro-ISIS groups, which will attract more foreign terrorist fighters to come. The research in Miangas analyses the level of security threats by making with various parties and field observation by applying both traditional and non-traditional approaches. Field research conducted in January-July 2017 by adopting qualitative methodology in its data analysis. Its findings reveal vulnerabilities in Miangas from possible terrorist acts of pro-ISIS groups in South Philippines and the development of the low intensity conflicts. Although Miangas people has strong potentials to respond the threat, problem of connectivity of Miangas and other Indonesia’s islands, poor infrastructure and the absence of main weapons, as well as low discipline and mentality of the state and security apparatus there will their capability to quick and effectively respond every pro-ISIS terrorist attacks from the South Philippines.
AbstrakEskalasi konflik berskala rendah dan terdesaknya kelompok-kelompok teroris pro-ISIS di Filipina Selatan oleh operasi militer Presiden Duterte dapat membawa dampak ke Miangas. Pulau terdepan Indonesia yang perairannya berbatasan langsung itu diantisipasi aparat Indonesia dapat dijadikan tempat pelarian dan basis persembunyian baru Kelompok Abu Sayyaf, Maute dan pro-ISIS lain, dengan kehadiran teroris asal mancanegara.  Penelitian ini menganalisis sejauh mana ancaman yang ada, dengan mewawancarai banyak pihak dan melakukan observasi lapangan, dengan memakai perspektif keamanan tradisional dan jnon-tradisional. Penelitian dilakukan selama Januari-Juni 2017, dengan menggunakan metodologi kualitatif dalam analisis datanya. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan kerawanan Pulau Miangas dari berbagai kemungkinan ancaman serangan terorisme pengikut ISIS di Filipina Selatan dan perkembangan konflik berskala rendah di sana. Sekalipun terdapat potensi penduduk untuk menangkalnya, namun hambatan konektivitas Pulau Miangas dengan pulau-pulau lain di Indonesia, keterbatasan infrastruktur dan ketidaktersediaan alutsista, serta lemahnya mentalitas dan disiplin aparat pemerintahan dan keamanan di sana, akan menyulitkan mereka untuk dapat merespons secara cepat dan efektif setiap serangan terorisme para pengikut ISIS di Filipina Selatan.

Keywords

terrorism; ISIS; FTFs; South Philippines; Miangas; safe haven; terorisme; Filipina Selatan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku

Abimayu, Bambang (2006). Teror Bom Azahari-Noor Din. Jakarta: Penerbit Republika.

Acharya, Amitav (2012). The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region. Singapore:ISEAS.

Agus SB. (2014). Merintis Jalan Mencegah Terorisme. Jakarta; Semarak Lautan Warna.

Adjie S (2005). Terorisme. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Alexander, Yonah and Dean Alexander (2015). The Islamic State: Combating the Caliphate without Borders. London: Lexington Books.

Ali, As’ád Said (2014). Al-Qaeda: Tinjauan Sosial-Politik, Ideologi dan Sepak Terjangnya. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Anak Agung Banyu Perwita dan Yanyan Mochamad Yani (2011), Pengantar Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Assad, Muhammad Haidar (2014). ISIS: Organisasi Teroris Paling Mengerikan Abad Ini. Jakarta: Zahira.

Berman, Eli (2011). Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Terrorism, Massachussets, MIT Press.

Buzan, Barry (1991). People, States & Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post- Cold War Era, 1991, The University of Michigan, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Djelantik, Sukawarsini (2010). Terorisme: Tinjauan Psiko-Politis, Peran Media, Kemiskinan, dan Keamanan Nasional. Jakarta: Pustaka Obor.

Golose, Petrus Reinhard (2009). Deradikalisasi Terorisme. Jakarta: YPKIK.

Heijmans, Annelies, Nicola Simmonds, and Hans van de Veen (2014). Searching for Peace in Asia Pacific: An Overview of Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities. London, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publihsers.

Jemadu, Aleksius (2014). Politik Global dalam Teori dan Praktek, Edisi 2, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Jones, David Martin (2004). Globalisation and the New Terror: The Asia Pacific Dimension. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Kahfi, Syahdatul (2006).Terorisme di Tengah Arus Global Demokrasi. Spectrum.

Kleinen, John and Manon Osseweijer (2010). Pirates, Ports, and Coasts in Asia: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Singapore: ISEAS.

Lister, Charles R (2015). The Syrian Jihad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mabon, Simon (2016). Saudi Arabia and Iran: Power and Rivalry in the Middle East. London and New York: IB Tauris.

McRae, Dave (2015). Poso: Sejarah Komprehensif Kekerasan Antar Agama Terpanjang di Indonesia Pasca-Reformasi. Jakarta: Marjin Kiri.

Nicholson, Michael. (1998) International Relations, London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

Neumann, Peter R (2013). Options and Strategies for Countering Online Radicalization in the United States. London: King's College.

Nye, Jr., Joseph S (2003). Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History. New York: Longman.

Samuel, Thomas Koruth (2016). Radicalisation in Southeast Asia: A Selected Case Study of Daesh in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines, Malaysia: SEARCCT.

Simonsen, Clifford E. and Jeremy R. Spindlove (2004). Terrorism Today: The Past, the Players, the Future. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Singh, Daljit (2009). Terrorism in South and Southeast Asia in the Coming Decade. Singapore: ISEAS.

Smelser, Neil J. and Faith Mitchell (eds.) (2001). Terrorism: Perspectives from the Behavioral Science. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

Snowden, Lynne L.and Bradley C. Whitsel (2005). Terrorism: Research, Readings, and Realities. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Stern, Jessica (2003). Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militant Kills. New York: Harper Collins.

Stern, Jessica and J.M. Berger (2015). ISIS: The State of Terror. Ecco; Wiliam and Collins.

Viotti, Paul R. dan Mark V. Kauppi (1993), International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, Second Edition, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Wahid, Abdul, Sunardi, dan Muhammad Imam Sidik (2004). Kejahatan Terorisme: Perspektif Agama, HAM, dan Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Whitetaker, David J (2004). Terrorist and Terrorism in the Contemporary World. London: Routledge.

White, Jonathan R (2012). Terrorism and Homeland Security. USA: Wadsworth.

Jurnal

Gunaratna, Rohan (2016). “Islamic State branches in Southeast Asia,” Pacific Forum, CSIS, Number 7, 19 January 2016.

Jones, David Martin; Smith, M L R (2012). “Organization vs. Ideology: The Lessons from Southeast Asia.” Current Trends in Islamist Ideology, Vol. 12. Washington DC: Hudson Institute: 92-123.

Kim, Hyung Jong and Lee, Poh Ping (2011). “The Changing Role of Dialogue in the International Relations of Southeast Asia.”Asian Survey (Sept/Oct), 51.5. Berkeley (Sep/Oct): 953-970.

Li, Wei (2015). “Near ISIS Threat – Islamic State of Irap and al-Sham seeks to extend its presence to Central Asia and beyond,” Beijing Review, Beijing.

Ramakrishna S, Kumar (2017). “The Growth of ISIS Extremism in Southeast Asia: Its Ideological and Cognitive Features—and Possible Policy Responses,” New England Journal of Public Policy, Volume 29, Issue 1, Article 6, Singapore: Nanyang Technological University, 2017.

__________. (2016). “Reflections of a Reformed Jihadist: The Story of Wan Min Wan Mat.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 38.3. Singapore: 495-522.

Thayer, Carlyle A (2016).“Southeast Asia’s Regional Autonomy under Stress.” Asian Affairs.” Singapore: ISEAS: 3-18.

Copyright (c) 2023 Kajian
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.