PEMBARUAN HUKUM ACARA PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI BAWAH UNDANG-UNDANG

Fajar Laksono Soeroso
| Abstract views: 256 | views: 1876

Abstract

The mechanism of judicial review of implementing provision of laws is currently regulated under Perma No.1/2011 on the Rights to Judicial Review. In practice, It is stiff seen that the regulation is not sufficient to uphold the rule of law and to create an open and fair trial mandated by the 1945 State Constitution. This essay argues the need to improve the Perma No. 1/2011 and the efforts to make reform, as well. As a consequence, there are some important  issues to be coped with, among others, the absence of testing mechanism with an open trial, uncertainty in the judicial process and stages, the forge amount of cost applicants must pay, the citation and substance of the decision, the nature of decision does not  need to apply, and the absence of reconsideration  mechanism. The writer  reveals that  there are ways of reform of mechanism of judicial  review of the implementing provisions of laws, namely (1) sending the proposal of the amendments  of  the Perma to  the Supreme Court, (2) making  the judicial  review of  the Perma No.1/2011  in the Supreme Court, (3) push it to become a legislation, and (4) sending the judicial  review of  Law on the Supreme Court and Law on Judge to the Constitutional Court.

Keywords

perma no. 1/2011; procedure law; legal reform; judicial review; supreme court

Full Text:

Untitled

References

Buku

Manan, A. (2006). Aspek-Aspek Pengubah Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Ardhiwisastra, Y. B. (2000). Penafsiran dan Konstruksi Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

_________ (2006). Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan, Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

_________ dan Ahmad Syahrizal (2006). Peradilan Konstitusi di Sepuluh Negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Barron, J. A. and C. Thomas S. (1986). Constitutional Law. St. Paul Menn-West Publishing Co.

Chemerinsky, E. (1997). Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies. New York, USA: Aspen Law & Business.

Finer, S.E., et. al. (1995). Comparing Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Friedmann, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Gisburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge University Press.

Graglia, L. A. (1990). How the Constitution Disappeared, dalam Jack N. Rakove (edt), Interpreting the Constitution, Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (1970). Fungsi dan Perkembangan Hukum dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Mertokusumo, S. (2001). Penemuan Hukum, Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Membangun dan Merombak Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Schwartz, B. (1997). A Book of Legal Lists- The Best and Worst in American Law. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

Siahaan, M. (2006). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Soemantri, S. (1997). Hak Uji Material di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Soeprapto, M. F. I. (2007). llmu Perundang-Undangan. Yogyakarta: Kanisus.

Thayer, J. B. (2005). "Sumber dan Ruang lingkup Doktrin Hukum Konstitusional Amerika", dalam Leonard W. Levy (ed.), Judicial Review, Sejarah Kelahiran, Wewenang dan Fungsinya dalam Negara Demokrasi. Bandung: Penerbit Nusamedia dan Penerbit Nuansa.

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2007). "Pembaruan Hukum Masyarakat Indonesia Baru" dalam Dony Donardono, Wacana Pembaharuan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: HuMa.

Jurnal/Makalah

Brown, T. l. and Wise, C. R. (1994). "Constitutional Courts and Executive-Legislative Relations: the Case of Ukraine". International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 43, Number 1, January.

lsra, S. dan Amsari, F. (2008). "Perubahan Konstitusi melalui Tafsir MK", Jurnal Konstitusi PUSaKO, Vol. 1 No. 1, November.

Mahfud, M. D. (2011). "Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Pengawal Konstitusi dalam Sistem Demokrasi Indonesia". Bahan yang disajikan pada Kuliah Pembuka Mahasiswa Baru Tahun 2011 Program Pascasarjana Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Sabtu, 20 Agustus.

Soeroso, F. L. (2012). "Memaknai Kecenderungan Penyelesaian Konflik Batas Wilayah ke Mahkamah Konstitusi". Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 9 No. 3, September.

Surat kabar

Armanjaya, L. "Dekonstruksi Fungsi Legislasi", Kompas, 6 Mei 2008.

Internet

Sanden, J. Methods of Interpreting The Constitution; Estonia's Way in an Increasingly Integrated Europe, Juridica International Vlll/2003, http://www.juridica.ee/get_doc.php?id=635, (diakses tanggal 5 Januari 2008).

"lni 10 Masalah Peradilan Indonesia versi Bagir Manan", http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt53 7ddbba678b8/ini-10-masalah-peradiIan-indonesia-versi-bagir-manan, (diakses tanggal 24 Juli 2014).

Lain-lain

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 110,111,112,113/PUU-Vll/2009.

Copyright (c) 2016 Kajian
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.