Perlindungan Ham Dalam Prosedur Penentuan Daftar Terduga Teroris Dan Organisasi Teroris Di Indonesia (The Human Rights Protection On Determining Suspected Terrorism And Terrorist Organization’s Procedure In Indonesia)

Marfuatul Latifa
| Abstract views: 289 | views: 185

Abstract

The procedure of identification individual and entity in Consolidated United Nation Security Council Sanctions List of Suspected Terrorist Organization, that issued by the UN Security Council are considered not give the real protection for human rights in particular, the fair trial principle. Due to the absence of the pleading/clarification mechanism for the object that affected. The United Nations has sought to improve the procedure of inclusion in the Consolidated United Nations Security Council Sanctions List Of Suspected Terrorist Organizations and Individuals by adopting the due process of law model in the process of identity determination on the list. the amendment of the procedure has not been sufficient to provide human rights protection for individuals subject to the list, because it has not implemented due process of law properly. It proven by the lack of an authorized, free and open judiciary to decide whether a person should be identified the list. Indonesia also issued a list of suspected terrorists and terrorist organizations but the listing procedure only involves the judicial authorities only as a legitimate giver of the list through determination. it is necessary to refine procedures for identity-seeking on the suspected Terrorist List and terrorist organizations to conform with the agreement in Amendment to Law no. 15 of 2003, which states that an organization of terrorism can also be established through a court decision

 

Abstrak

Prosedur pencantuman identitas pada Consolidated United Nations Security Council Sanctions List of Suspected Terrorist Organizations and Individual yang dikeluarkan oleh Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB) sampai saat ini dianggap belum melindungi hak asasi manusia (HAM) bagi masyarakat internasional, khususnya prinsip untuk mendapatkan persidangan yang adil (fair trial). Hal tersebut karena tidak tersedianya pembelaan/klarifikasi dari objek yang akan dan/atau telah ditetapkan dalam daftar tersebut. PBB telah berupaya memperbaiki prosedur pencantuman identitas pada Consolidated United Nations Security Council Sanctions List of Suspected Terrorist Organizations and Individual dengan mengadopsi due process of law model dalam proses pencantuman identitas. Perubahan prosedur tersebut sampai saat ini masih belum cukup memberikan perlindungan HAM bagi individu yang menjadi subjek karena belum menerapkan due process of law secara utuh. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dengan masih belum adanya pihak peradilan yang berwenang, bebas, dan terbuka untuk memutuskan apakah sesorang patut dicantumkan identitasnya dalam daftar tersebut. Indonesia juga mengeluarkan Daftar Terduga Teroris dan Organisasi Teroris. Prosedur yang digunakan dalam mencantumkan identitas orang, organisasi, dan/atau korporasi dalam daftar tersebut telah berupaya menghadirkan pihak yudisial, namun prosedur pelibatan pihak yudisial hanya sebatas pemberi legalitas dari daftar melalui penetapan. Perlu dilakukan penyempurnaan prosedur bagi pencatuman identitas dalam Daftar Terduga Teroris dan Organisasi Teroris untuk menyesuaikan dengan kesepakatan dalam Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2003, yang menyatakan bahwa sebuah organisasi terorisme dapat juga ditetapkan melalui putusan pengadilan agar perlindungan HAM bagi subjek yang telah/akan dicantumkan di daftar dapat terwujud.

Keywords

Daftar Terduga Terorisme; Perlindungan HAM; Prinsip Peradilan yang Adil; Terorismel; Terrorism Suspected List; Right Protection; Fair Trial; Terrorism

Full Text:

PDF

References

Jurnal

Feinäugle, Clemens A. “The UN Security Council Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee: Emerging Principles of International Institutional Law for the Protection of Individuals?. German Law Journal. Vol. 9 No. 11, 2008.

Griffiths, John. “Ideology in Criminal Procedure or a Third "Model" of the Criminal Process”. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 79. No. 3. January 1970.

Kokott, Juliane. Christoph Sobotta. “The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?” The European Journal of International Law. Vol. 23 No. 4, Agustus 2012.

Oehmichen, Anna, “UN-EU-Terrorist Listings–Legal Foundations and Impacts”. Zeitschrift fur Internationale Strafrechtsdomatik. Vol. 9, 2014.

Stevens, Joe. “No New Weapons for the UN Ombudsperson?”. Journal of Terrorism Research, Vol. 2 Issue 3, November 2012.

Suhayati, Monika. “Undang-Undang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak PIdana Pendanaan Terorisme dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia”. Jurnal Negara Hukum. Vol. 4 No. 2. November 2013.

Victor D. Comras, “UN Terrorist Designation System Needs Reform”, Perspective On Terrorism Journal. Vol. II. Issue 10. Juli 2008.

Buku

Atmasasmita, Romli. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bagian II. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Hecca Mitra Utama, 2004.

Casese, Antonio. Guido Acquaviva, Mary Fan, and Alex Whiting. International Criminal Law Cases and Commentary, United States: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Counter Terrorism Implementation Task Force. “Basic Human Rights Refference Guide: Right to a Fair Trial and Due Process in the Context of Countering Terrorism”, Oktober 2014.

Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Penerbit UNDIP. 1998.

Watson Institute. “Due Process and Targetted Sanction an Update of Watson Report”, Watson Report Update, Desember 2012.

Watson Institute. “Strengthening Targeted Sanctions Through Fair and Clear Procedures”, Targeted Sanctions Project Brown University, Maret 2006.

Makalah

Wessel, Ramses A. “The Rule of Law and the Security Council: The New Procedures for the Legal Protection of Individuals in the Fight against Terrorism”, makalah dipresentasikan pada Ius Commune Workshop Accountability and the Rule of Law at International Level, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 25 Januari 2008

Pustaka Dalam Jaringan

“UN Ombudsman to review list of terrorist suspect”. https://sputniknews.com/world/20091218157281633/, diakses tanggal 7 Juli 2017.

Angriani, Desi. 27 Januari 2016, “Revisi UU Terorisme Murni Inisiatif Pemerintah”, http://news.metrotvnews.com/hukum/GKdnz80b-revisi-uu-terorisme-murni-inisiatif-pemerintah. diakses tanggal 7 Juli 2017.

Birkhäuser, Noah,. “Sanctions of the Security Council Against Individuals – Some Human Rights Problems”. http://www.esil-sedi.eu/sites/default/files/Birkhauser.PDF. diakses tanggal 4 Mei 2018.

Hakim. Rakhmad Nur, 24 Maret 2017. "Penetapan Organisasi Teroris Akan Diputuskan Lewat Pengadilan". https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/03/24/14101031/penetapan.organisasi.teroris.akan.diputuskan.lewat.pengadilan. diakses tanggal 17 Juli 2017.

Israel, Jerold H. “Cornerstone of the Judicial Process”. University Of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1229&context=articles. diakses tanggal 4 Mei 2018.

Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Daftar Terduga Teroris dan Organisasi Teroris Nomor: DTTOT/P-2a/931/V/2016, 31 Mei 2016, http://www.ppatk.go.id/backend/assets/uploads/20160926161236.pdf. diakses tanggal 17 Juli 2017

Kuado. Fabian Januarius, 30 Maret 2017. ”Keputusan Penetapan Organisasi Teroris melalui Pengadilan diapresiasi” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/03/30/07273901/keputusan.penetapan.organisasi.teroris.melalui.pengadilan.diapresiasi. diakses tanggal 17 Juli 2017.

Security Coucil Committe Pursuant to Resolution 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011), and 2253 (2015) Concerning ISIL (DA’ESH), Al-Qaida and Associated Individuals Groups Undertakings and Entities “Procedures for Listing”. https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/procedures-for-listing. diakses tanggal 7 Februari 2018.

Syafirdi. Didi, 4 April 2017. “Tiga poin penting dalam revisi UU Terorisme, tak cuma penindakan”. https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/tiga-poin-penting-dalam-revisi-uu-terorisme-tak-cuma-penindakan.html. diakses tanggal 17 Juli 2017.

UN Security Council Report, “Fact Sheet on The Security Council Committee Pursuant to Resolutions 1267 (1999) 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) Concerning ISIL (DA’ESH) AL-QAIDA and Associated Individuals Groups Undertakings And Entities”, 1 Januari 2081, http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/terrorism-sanctions-fact-sheet.pdf, diakses tanggal 26 Februari 2018.

Copyright (c) 2018 Negara Hukum
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN: 2614-2813

Hosted by Mason Publishing, part of the George Mason University Libraries.