PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK DI TANAH PAPUA DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK
Nomensen ST. Mambraku
| Abstract views: 1441
| 
views: 2180
Abstract
This study offers five recommendations for a peaceful conflict resolution in Papua, emphasising political openness and persuasion, the role of local authorities and Papuan People’s Council, as well as imposing sanction to perpetrators of grave human rights violations and creating stability and an effective mechanism. These recommendations are expected to be able to diminish the sources of conflict in Papua which caused by different perceptions on the 1969 Pepera implementation and development policies and approaches. With the use of pattern and direction analysis, and analysis of policy effectiveness of every period of government since the Old Order, this study concludes that the majority of policies introduced by the government are far from expected. This study also found that coercive- repressive approach continues to occur in Papua.
Keywords
Full Text:
UntitledReferences
Buku
Alfian. (1986). Pemikiran dan Perubahan Politik Indonesia: Kumpulan Karangan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Alua, Agus. (2002). Dialog Nasional Papua dan Indonesia 26 Februari 1999,”Kembalikan Kedaulatan Papua Barat, Pulang dan Renungkan Dulu”. Jayapura: Sekretariat Presidium Dewan Papua dan Biro STFT Fajar Timur.
Araf, Al, Aliabbas, Anton, Manto, Ardi, dkk, (2011). Sekuritisasi Papua: Implikasi Pendekatan Keamanan terhadap Kondisi HAM di Papua. Jakarta: Imparsial.
Center for Human Dialog. (2011). Pengelolaan Konflik di Indonesia – Sebuah Analisis Konflik di Maluku, Papua dan Poso. Jenewa
Chauvel, Richard. (2005). Constructing Papua Nationalism: History, Etnicity, and Adaptation. Washington: East-West Center.
Fattah, Eep Saefullah. (2010) Konflik, Manipulasi, dan Kebangkrutan Orde Baru: Penyelesaian Konflik Politik Orde Baru: Peristiwa Malari, Petisi 50 dan Tanjung Priok. Jakarta: burung Merak Press.
Hadi, Syamsul, Widjajanto, Andi, dkk. (2007). Disintegrasi pasca orde baru: negara, konflik lokal dan dinamika internasional. Jakarta: CIReS FISIP UI dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Lijphart, Arend. (1980). Democracy in Plural Society: A Comperative Exploration. London: Yale University Press.
Meteray, Bernada. (2012). Nasionalisme Ganda Orang Papua. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.
Paskalis Keagop. dkk, Rekam Jejak Majelis Rakyat Papua 2005-2015, Jayapura: Suara Perempuan Papua
Tebay, Neles. (2009). Dialog Jakarta-Papua, Sebuah Perspektif Papua. Jayapura: Office for Justice and Peace.
Widjojo, Muridan S. (2001). Di Antara Kebutuhan Demokrasi dan Kemenangan Politik Kekerasan: Konflik Papua Pasca Orde Baru. Jakarta: LP3ES.
_______________. (2009). Papua Road Map: Negotiating the Past, Improving the Present and Securing the Future. Jakarta: Tifa Foundation.
Artikel dalam Jurnal atau Majalah
Ayorbaba, Anthonius. (2011). The Papua Way Dinamika Konflik Laten & Refleksi 10 Tahun Otsus Papua, Suara Perempuan Papua.
Trijono, Lambang. (2007). Otonomi Khusus dan Pembangunan Aras Lokal Papua, ANALISIS CSIS, Vol. 35, No. 4, Desember.
______________. (2009). Pembangunan Perdamaian Pasca-Konflik di Indonesia: Kaitan Perdamaian, Pembangunan dan Demokrasi dalam Pengembangan Kelembagaan Pasca-Konflik, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Vol. 13, No. 1, Juli.
Oegroseno, Arif Havas. (2007). Doktrin Uti Possidetis Juris dan Status Hukum Provinsi Papua, Analisis CSIS, Vol. 35 No. 4.
Buku Terjemahan
Dahl, Robert A. (1985). Dilema Demokrasi Pluralis: Antara Otonomi dan Kontrol, terjemahan oleh Sahat Simamora. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Internet
Kartono, Alfian. (2014). Dewan Adat: 5 Warga Tewas dalam Bentrok di Paniai Enarotali, (online), (http://regional.kompas.com/read/2014/12/08/20532121/Dewan.Adat.5.Warga.Tewas. dalam.Bentrok.di.Paniai.Enarotali,diakses 29 April 2015.
Resolution of the Second Papua’s People Congress, 4 Juni 2000. (online), (http://freewestpapua.org /docs/congressII.htm, diakses 29 April 2015)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
