ULASAN METODOLOGI KUALITATIF: WAWANCARA TERHADAP ELIT

Lukman Nul Hakim

Abstract

In the past two decades literature studies on elite has emerged even though still small in number. Elites are people who because of his/her position or role and can influence decisions concerning the lives of many people. Therefore every behavior, decision making and mindset of elite is an interesting subject to be studied in a deeper level. But in reality making elite as research subject provide challenges. Among the many approaches to qualitative methods, interviewing techniques most widely used to assess the elite, therefore this article discusses the challenges that will be faced by researchers when interviewing elites. Starting from the things that must be prepared before the researchers conducted interviews, during the interview, and after the interview. With good preparation then the research process can be optimized.

Keywords

Metode penelitian kualitatif, wawancara, elit.

Full Text:

Untitled

References

Buku

Glassman, William E. & Hadad, Marilyn. 2009. Approaches to Psychology. 5thed. Bershire: McGraw-Hill.

Singh, A.K. 2004. Tests, Measurements and Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Patna: Bharati Bhawan.

Stewart, C.J. & Cash W.B. 1982. Interviewing Principles and Practices. 3rd edition. Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher.

Jurnal

Aberbach, J.F., & Rockman, B.A. 2002. “Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews.” Political Science and Politics. 35, 673-676.

Best, H. 2011. “Does Personality Matter in Politics? Personality Factors as Determinants of Parliamentary Recruitment and Policy Preferences.” Comparative Sociology. 10, 928–948. DOI: 10.1163/156913311X607638.

Burton, E.M.H., Hughes, D.A., Victora, D.G. 2011. “The Behavioral Psychology of Elite Decision Making: Implications for Political Science.” Elsevier, 1-15.

Conti, J., & O’Neil, M. 2007. “Studying power: Qualitative methods and the global elite.” Qualitative Research, 7 (1), 63-82.

Crichlow, S. 2002. “Legislators’ Personality Traits and Congressional Support for Free Trade.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 5, 693-711. DOI: 10.1177/ 002200202236170.

Dietrich, B.J., Lasley, S,. Mondak, J., Remmel, M.L., & Turner, J. 2012. “Personality and Legislative Politics: The Big Five Trait Dimensions Among U.S. State Legislators.” Political Psychology, 33, 2, 195-210, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00870.x.

Dille, B. 2000. “The Prepared and Spontaneous Remarks of Presidents Reagan and Bush: A Validity Comparison for At-a-Distance Measurements.” Political Psychology, 21, 3, 573-585.

Dyson, S.B., & Preston, T. 2006. “Individual Characteristics of Political Leaders and the Use of Analogy in Foreign Policy Decision Making.” Political Psychology, 27, 2, 265-288. Dyson, S.B. 2006. “Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions.” Foreign Policy Analysis, 2, 289–306.

Dyson, S.B. 2007. “Alliances, Domestic Politics, andLeader Psychology: Why Did Britain Stay out of Vietnam andGo into Iraq?.” Political Psychology, 28, 6, 647-666.

Dyson, S.B. 2009. “Cognitive Style and Foreign Policy: Margaret Thatcher’s Black-and-White Thinking.” International Political Science Review, 30, 1, 3348. DOI: 10.1177/ 0192512108097055.

Harvey, William. S. 2011. “Strategies for Conducting Elite Interviews.” Qualitative Research, 11 (4), 431-441.

Holt. A. 2010. “Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note.” Qualitative Research 10 (1): 113–121.

Jensen, T., & Winzen, T. 2012. “Legislative negotiations in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics, 13, 188, 118-149. DOI: 10.1177/ 1465116511419982.

Kearns, D. 1976. “Lyndon Johnson’s Political Personality.” Political Science Quarterly, 91, 385–409.

Keller, Jonathan W. & Yang, Yi Edward. 2008. “Leadership Style, Decision Context, and the Poliheuristic Theory of Decision Making: An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 687-712.

Knoke, David. 1993. “Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making.” Sociological Methods & Research, 22 (1), 23-45. Latcham, J. 1982. “President McKinley’s active-positive typology: A comparative revision with Barber’s typology.” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 12, 491–521.

Laurila, J. 1997. “Promoting research access and informant rapport in corporate settings: Notes from research on a crisis company.” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13, 407-418.

McConaughy, J. B. 1950. “Certain personality factors of state legislators in South Carolina.”American Political Science Review, 44, 897-903.

Mikecz, Robert. 2012. “Interviewing Elites: Addressing Methodological Issues.” Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 482-493.

Ostrander, S.A. 1993. “Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful. Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22 (1): 7–27.

Schoen, Harald. 2007. “Personality Traits and Foreign Policy Attitudes in German Public Opinion.”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 408-430.

Smith, K.E. 2006. “Problematising power relations in ‘elite’ interviews.” Geoforum, 37: 643–653.

Stephens, N. 2007. “Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: telephone and face-to-face inter views with macoeconomists.” Qualitative Research, 7(2), 203–216.

Wright, G.C. 2007. “Do Term Limits Affect Legislative Roll Call Voting? Representation, Polarization, and Participation.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7, 3, 256-280.

Zuckerman, H.A. 1972. “Interviewing an Ultra-elite.” The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36: 159–175.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v4i2.501

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.